From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32525 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2009 20:37:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 32517 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2009 20:37:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f227.google.com) (209.85.219.227) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:37:32 +0000 Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so71906ewy.16 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:37:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.89.70 with SMTP id b48mr2608473wef.160.1259181448386; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:37:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm3659350eye.3.2009.11.25.12.37.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:37:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B0D993B.5070000@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:37:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" CC: Dave Korn , Richard Guenther , Richard Kenner , matz@suse.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, hongjiu.lu@intel.com, law@redhat.com Subject: Re: [annoyed grunt]? References: <10911251651.AA00241@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <4B0D6245.3010601@redhat.com> <10911251719.AA00825@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <4B0D95A0.8030104@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00714.txt.bz2 Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote: > From: "Dave Korn" > >> But does it, though? From http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html: >> >>> Free for all >>> >>> The following changes can be made by everyone with SVN write access: >>> >>> Fixes for obvious typos in ChangeLog files, docs, web pages, comments >>> and >>> similar stuff. Just check in the fix and copy it to gcc-patches. We >>> don't >>> want to get overly anal-retentive about checkin policies. > > Incorrect whitespace is a "typo". I.e. an error in "typed" material. > Agreed, but what I'm not at all certain is whether it counts as *in* "ChangeLog files, docs, web pages, comments and similar stuff", specifically when it's at the end of a line of functional C code in a source file. cheers, DaveK