From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20628 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2009 18:46:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 20618 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2009 18:46:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-104-thursday.nerim.net (HELO kraid.nerim.net) (62.4.16.104) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:46:34 +0000 Received: from hector.lesours (ours.starynkevitch.net [213.41.244.95]) by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA570CF141; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:46:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from glinka.lesours ([192.168.0.1]) by hector.lesours with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NDjLg-0001hQ-VT; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:45:49 +0100 Message-ID: <4B0ECCE1.6060306@starynkevitch.net> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:46:00 -0000 From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20091109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Matz CC: Jeff Law , Richard Guenther , Dave Korn , "Joseph S. Myers" , Richard Kenner , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, hongjiu.lu@intel.com Subject: Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue References: <10911251651.AA00241@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <4B0D6245.3010601@redhat.com> <4B0D6708.7060306@redhat.com> <4B0D6DE6.4010708@gmail.com> <4B0D8C4B.9020405@redhat.com> <4B0D8ED5.1060303@starynkevitch.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00755.txt.bz2 Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > >>> 1. What to do in the immediate term with the repo. I've got no strong >>> opinions here. >> I do understand most of the opinions, but I would rather prefer that we >> don't revert the trailing whitespace patch. I definitely can live with >> them, and they probably cleaned up a bit the code. > > How, for goodness sake, can pure trailing whitespace changes, which by > necessity you can't even _see_ in an editor (except if you activate modes > that explicitely show them e.g. in different color) clean up code? Have > you looked at the patch or fallout from it? If not, why do you speak in > favor of it? I was speaking in favor of the patch because it apparently make the GCC code more conformant to GCC coding styles. Regards. -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***