From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-158360-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32525 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2009 04:12:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 32516 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2009 04:12:47 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f227.google.com) (209.85.219.227)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:12:41 +0000
Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so1517352ewy.16         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:12:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.23.75 with SMTP id q11mr599457ebb.43.1259295159199;         Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:12:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm2179855eyd.5.2009.11.26.20.12.36         (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:12:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B0F556D.8040607@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:12:00 -0000
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: yunfeng zhang <zyf.zeroos@gmail.com>
CC: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>,   Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,  gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: No .got section in ELF
References: <4df04b840911231758md5a545el2d417b663af1647f@mail.gmail.com> 	 <4df04b840911251824j71fa1d33i2cecc9481617dda5@mail.gmail.com> 	 <4B0DF1EC.30001@redhat.com> 	 <4df04b840911252204g33297e18m8e189c62a0662378@mail.gmail.com> 	 <orocmplo03.fsf@livre.localdomain> <4df04b840911261818q50f3da9bs3213c1a2982278f4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4df04b840911261818q50f3da9bs3213c1a2982278f4@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00760.txt.bz2

yunfeng zhang wrote:

> have an *exact* map to foo.so in disk

  This is where your misunderstanding arises.  Just as 5+3 can add up to the
same result as 4+4, so you cannot ignore that the final mapped addresses you
are seeing add up to the same result via different routes.  Compile your
sources using --save-temps, and look at the differences in the generated
assembly files.  By looking only at the final results, you are losing
information about how those results are arrived at.

    cheers,
      DaveK