From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-159146-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8493 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2010 19:45:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 8484 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2010 19:45:23 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_PASS,WEBMAIL_BODY
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:45:17 +0000
Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so24201064ewy.9         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:45:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.110.4 with SMTP id l4mr1452235ebp.81.1263411907633;         Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm21689eyz.15.2010.01.13.11.45.05         (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:45:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B4E26B7.3040401@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:45:00 -0000
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@spamcop.net>
CC: 'GCC Mailing List' <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Target hook definition licensing problems (GPL vs GFDL)
References: <4AE6E471.4020200@starynkevitch.net> 	<4AE70C5E.4050005@starynkevitch.net> 	<84fc9c000910270839v2d9efe0dw829c8647f361c96f@mail.gmail.com> 	<4AE7164D.9010200@starynkevitch.net> 	<84fc9c000910270855w736df367qe511d8db280aaeb4@mail.gmail.com> 	<2dc303d60910271056h17038110ib63c53cfa374f5c7@mail.gmail.com> 	<20091102074959.p8410ulv28sg0w44-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> 	<20091105082557.75c2estyoog8ss0c-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> 	<-2186575642631489790@unknownmsgid> 	<55692dc10911050634y54a5fea7jd2ba773086cda60b@mail.gmail.com> 	<00d801ca5e34$e5384160$afa8c420$@fursin@inria.fr> 	<20091223101256.z6a8ug32o8k84o4o-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> 	<20091223193244.hqaet9zf488gw844-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> 	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0912241209420.32398@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> 	<20100113032220.pzerwhbtog0w4gsk-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> 	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1001131343010.2183@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20100113104833.w04ibz0e28owk4so-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100113104833.w04ibz0e28owk4so-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2

Joern Rennecke wrote:
> References: <4AE6E471.4020200@starynkevitch.net>
> <mcr3a54lwb4.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>
> <4AE70C5E.4050005@starynkevitch.net>
> <84fc9c000910270839v2d9efe0dw829c8647f361c96f@mail.gmail.com>
> <4AE7164D.9010200@starynkevitch.net>
> <84fc9c000910270855w736df367qe511d8db280aaeb4@mail.gmail.com>
> <2dc303d60910271056h17038110ib63c53cfa374f5c7@mail.gmail.com>
> <20091102074959.p8410ulv28sg0w44-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
> <20091105082557.75c2estyoog8ss0c-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
> <-2186575642631489790@unknownmsgid>

[  Never seen that before, looks as if someone used "%i" when they probably
meant "%u" or "%x"! ]

> <55692dc10911050634y54a5fea7jd2ba773086cda60b@mail.gmail.com>
> <00d801ca5e34$e5384160$afa8c420$@fursin@inria.fr>
> <20091223101256.z6a8ug32o8k84o4o-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
> <20091223193244.hqaet9zf488gw844-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0912241209420.32398@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
> <20100113032220.pzerwhbtog0w4gsk-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001131343010.2183@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
> <20100113110917.vqaoqpyyc0ck8gso-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>

  That didn't "start a new thread"!

    cheers,
      DaveK