From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11803 invoked by alias); 21 May 2003 23:16:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11794 invoked from network); 21 May 2003 23:16:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 May 2003 23:16:48 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (account dberlin HELO dberlin.org) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b6) with ESMTP-TLS id 4052424; Wed, 21 May 2003 19:16:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 00:42:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Bugzilla: number of bugs, milestones Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org To: "Joseph S. Myers" From: Daniel Berlin In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <4B6CB206-8BE2-11D7-AF07-000A95A34564@dberlin.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01981.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 05:49 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > (1) Doing an empty search query shows 1620 open bugs. The weekly bug > summary shows 1298, but I doubt we've been down that low in the past > week. > Have we really been that low, or is there some other reason for the > difference? Weekly bug summary isn't including WAITING/SUSPENDED I've fixed it. there are approximately 56 SUSPENDED bugs, and 266 WAITING bugs. 1298+322 = 1620 > > (2) Lots of bugs seem to be set to the 3.4 milestone, without any > indication in the comments that they are a regression, e.g. 1016. Why? It was the default milestone. > Bugs marked as a regression should be set to appropriate milestones > (3.3.1/3.4 according to whether the regression is present in 3.3) but a > lot of these don't seem to have any reason to have a milestone set. I can remove the milestone from all bugs if you like, and people can re-set it where approriate.