* Bugzilla: number of bugs, milestones
@ 2003-05-21 21:55 Joseph S. Myers
2003-05-22 0:42 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2003-05-21 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
(1) Doing an empty search query shows 1620 open bugs. The weekly bug
summary shows 1298, but I doubt we've been down that low in the past week.
Have we really been that low, or is there some other reason for the
difference?
(2) Lots of bugs seem to be set to the 3.4 milestone, without any
indication in the comments that they are a regression, e.g. 1016. Why?
Bugs marked as a regression should be set to appropriate milestones
(3.3.1/3.4 according to whether the regression is present in 3.3) but a
lot of these don't seem to have any reason to have a milestone set.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla: number of bugs, milestones
2003-05-21 21:55 Bugzilla: number of bugs, milestones Joseph S. Myers
@ 2003-05-22 0:42 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-22 6:51 ` Joseph S. Myers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-05-22 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: gcc
On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 05:49 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> (1) Doing an empty search query shows 1620 open bugs. The weekly bug
> summary shows 1298, but I doubt we've been down that low in the past
> week.
> Have we really been that low, or is there some other reason for the
> difference?
Weekly bug summary isn't including WAITING/SUSPENDED
I've fixed it.
there are approximately 56 SUSPENDED bugs, and 266 WAITING bugs.
1298+322 = 1620
>
> (2) Lots of bugs seem to be set to the 3.4 milestone, without any
> indication in the comments that they are a regression, e.g. 1016. Why?
It was the default milestone.
> Bugs marked as a regression should be set to appropriate milestones
> (3.3.1/3.4 according to whether the regression is present in 3.3) but a
> lot of these don't seem to have any reason to have a milestone set.
I can remove the milestone from all bugs if you like, and people can
re-set it where approriate.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla: number of bugs, milestones
2003-05-22 0:42 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2003-05-22 6:51 ` Joseph S. Myers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2003-05-22 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: gcc
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> I can remove the milestone from all bugs if you like, and people can
> re-set it where approriate.
I think that's appropriate (someone should re-set it based on the
regression information currently in the bug summaries).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-22 6:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-21 21:55 Bugzilla: number of bugs, milestones Joseph S. Myers
2003-05-22 0:42 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-22 6:51 ` Joseph S. Myers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).