public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Wilson <wilson@codesourcery.com>
To: roy rosen <roy.1rosen@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: lower subreg optimization
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBF597D.4000501@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <i2vbba479b11004072248gabfac370o3737996793a15d6c@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/07/2010 10:48 PM, roy rosen wrote:
> I saw in arm/neon.md that they have a similar problem:
> ...
> Their solution is also not complete.
> What is the proper way to handle such a case and how do I let gcc know
> that this is a simple move instruction so that gcc would be able to
> optimize it out?

The only simple solution at the moment is the one that the ARM port is 
using.  You avoid emitting the move when you got the lucky reg-alloc 
result, and you emit the move when you aren't lucky.

As the neon.md comment suggests, and as Ian Taylor mentioned in his 
response, a possible solution is to modify the lower-subreg.c pass 
somehow so that it no longer splits subregs of vector modes, possibly 
controlled by a hook.

We might be able to modify the register allocator to look for this 
pattern, to increase the chances of getting the good reg-alloc result, 
but the lower-subreg.c change is probably better.

Another solution might be to add a pass (or modify an existing one like 
regmove.c) to try to put things back together again, but this is 
probably also not as good as the lower-subreg.c change.

Jim

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-09 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-06  9:24 roy rosen
2010-04-06 16:37 ` Jim Wilson
2010-04-08  6:16   ` roy rosen
2010-04-09 16:52     ` Jim Wilson [this message]
2010-04-06 16:58 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-04-06 17:13   ` Nathan Froyd
2010-04-06 17:27     ` Steven Bosscher
2010-04-06 18:55     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-04-06 19:05       ` Nathan Froyd
2010-04-06 19:23       ` Joseph S. Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BBF597D.4000501@codesourcery.com \
    --to=wilson@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=roy.1rosen@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).