From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30211 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2010 16:31:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 30203 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2010 16:31:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-100-sunday.nerim.net (HELO kraid.nerim.net) (62.4.16.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:31:30 +0000 Received: from hector.lesours (ours.starynkevitch.net [213.41.244.95]) by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E381CF162; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:31:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from glinka.lesours ([192.168.0.1]) by hector.lesours with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O104F-0005E1-JV; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:31:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4BC1F987.7000408@starynkevitch.net> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:32:00 -0000 From: Basile Starynkevitch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Duncan Sands CC: Steven Bosscher , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? References: <20100409163655.GA25781@bromo.med.uc.edu> <4BBF5B7C.7060801@starynkevitch.net> <4BC07718.3060400@free.fr> <4BC1D647.60902@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <4BC1D647.60902@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2 Duncan Sands wrote: > > In my opinion a bit of friendly competition from LLVM is on the whole a > good thing for gcc. > I definitely agree with that position. Real competition between LLVM & GCC is good for both projects, and is good for free software as a whole. Cheers. -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***