From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
Cc: Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>,
Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc?
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC5C8F6.8050901@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100414133637.GA5210@bromo.med.uc.edu>
On 04/14/2010 03:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:24:35AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>>> FWIW, this sounds great and all... but I haven't actually seen any
>>> comparisons of GCC vs. LLVM with DragonEgg. A search with Google
>>> doesn't give me any results.
>>>
>>> Can you point out some postings where people actually made a
>>> comparison between GCC and LLVM with DragonEgg?
>>
>> I gave some comparisons in my talk at the 2009 LLVM developers meeting.
>> See the links at the bottom of http://dragonegg.llvm.org/
>>
>> Since then I've been working on completeness and correctness, and didn't
>> do any additional benchmarking yet. I don't know if anyone else did any
>> benchmarking. If so they didn't inform me.
>
> Duncan,
> It would be interesting to know what the Sqlite3 -O3/-O2 benchmarks
> show for llvm 2.7. I benchmarked about a 14% improvement in the
> Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks over a 13 month period of llvm development.
> Perhaps the current numbers look a bit better.
This kind of summarizes where the interest for dragonegg lies. :-P
Paolo
ps: look at smiley before clicking "reply"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-14 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-09 16:44 Jack Howarth
2010-04-09 18:16 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2010-04-10 13:37 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-11 12:54 ` Steven Bosscher
2010-04-11 14:17 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-11 14:57 ` Eric Botcazou
2010-04-11 15:41 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-11 15:56 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-11 16:02 ` Grigori Fursin
2010-04-11 16:02 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-11 16:28 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-11 16:31 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-13 16:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-04-11 18:15 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-11 16:26 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-11 16:26 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-11 16:34 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-11 17:47 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-11 16:37 ` Grigori Fursin
2010-04-11 18:50 ` Toon Moene
2010-04-11 21:43 ` Eric Botcazou
2010-04-11 16:32 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2010-04-21 16:52 ` Some benchmark comparison of gcc4.5 and dragonegg (was dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Vladimir Makarov
2010-04-21 17:00 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-21 17:09 ` Steven Bosscher
2010-04-21 17:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-04-21 18:28 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-21 18:09 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-22 10:24 ` Laurent GUERBY
2010-04-21 18:37 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2010-04-21 18:40 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-21 17:21 ` Vladimir Makarov
2010-04-21 18:23 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-21 20:54 ` Vladimir Makarov
2010-04-22 6:19 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-22 18:44 ` Vladimir Makarov
2010-04-21 20:58 ` Toon Moene
2010-04-22 6:29 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-21 17:05 ` Steven Bosscher
2010-04-21 17:10 ` Vladimir Makarov
2010-04-21 17:55 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2010-04-21 18:32 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-21 19:03 ` Eric Botcazou
2010-04-21 17:42 ` Chris Lattner
2010-04-21 18:19 ` Vladimir Makarov
2010-04-21 18:25 ` Chris Lattner
2010-04-21 18:41 ` Vladimir Makarov
2010-04-21 19:35 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-21 18:01 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-21 18:19 ` Vladimir Makarov
2010-04-11 14:30 ` dragonegg in FSF gcc? Jack Howarth
2010-04-11 15:36 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2010-04-11 16:33 ` Dave Korn
2010-04-11 19:06 ` Laurent GUERBY
2010-04-11 22:19 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2010-04-11 22:26 ` Dave Korn
2010-04-12 7:34 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2010-04-12 13:38 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-12 13:42 ` Robert Dewar
2010-04-12 13:52 ` Richard Guenther
2010-04-12 14:00 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-12 15:59 ` Steven Bosscher
2010-04-12 16:03 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-12 16:27 ` Steven Bosscher
2010-04-12 18:03 ` Dave Korn
2010-04-12 14:00 ` Dave Korn
2010-04-12 14:47 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2010-04-12 17:58 ` Weddington, Eric
2010-04-12 21:13 ` Toon Moene
2010-04-12 22:51 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-04-23 13:50 ` Poor internal documentation (was: dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Philipp Thomas
2010-04-23 14:26 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2010-04-24 19:07 ` Documentation legal issues (Was: Re: Poor internal documentation) Joern Rennecke
2010-06-05 10:10 ` Poor internal documentation (was: dragonegg in FSF gcc?) Philipp Thomas
2010-06-05 13:17 ` Jonathan Wakely
2010-04-13 17:15 ` dragonegg in FSF gcc? Paolo Bonzini
2010-04-13 17:18 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-13 17:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-04-13 19:19 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-13 19:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-04-13 20:29 ` Diego Novillo
2010-04-13 21:04 ` Steven Bosscher
2010-04-13 21:16 ` Diego Novillo
2010-04-14 14:06 ` Grigori Fursin
2010-04-13 18:05 ` Steven Bosscher
2010-04-13 19:26 ` Andrew Pinski
2010-04-13 19:28 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-13 17:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-04-13 21:06 ` Testing GCC on Cygwin made substantially easier [was Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc?] Dave Korn
2010-05-26 9:37 ` Laurynas Biveinis
2010-04-13 23:11 ` dragonegg in FSF gcc? Steven Bosscher
2010-04-13 23:43 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-14 6:48 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-14 13:54 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-14 13:59 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2010-04-11 14:33 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-11 15:06 ` David Edelsohn
2010-04-11 15:24 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-11 16:17 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-11 16:20 ` Jack Howarth
2010-04-11 22:48 ` Jonathan Wakely
2010-04-12 13:35 ` Duncan Sands
2010-04-12 15:03 ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2010-04-12 15:34 ` Jack Howarth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BC5C8F6.8050901@gnu.org \
--to=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=baldrick@free.fr \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu \
--cc=stevenb.gcc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).