From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12573 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2010 17:49:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 12550 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Apr 2010 17:49:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:49:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LHnIOI025299 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:49:18 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LHnHaK020405 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:49:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4BCF3A9C.3020606@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:51:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Code assistance with GCC References: <4BCED45A.6040609@cx4a.org> <73193A25-EF3D-4B9B-B7E3-640AC749B95E@apple.com> In-Reply-To: <73193A25-EF3D-4B9B-B7E3-640AC749B95E@apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2 On 04/21/2010 06:35 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Apr 21, 2010, at 3:32 AM, Tomohiro Matsuyama wrote: > >> Hi, all >> >> I have been working on implementing a tool-set of code assistance >> called GCCSense, which enables code-completion for C/C++ in editors >> or a terminal. >> >> http://cx4a.org/software/gccsense/ > > This approach seems highly, uh, "inspired" from the exact same > functionality in Clang. Any reason not to contribute to that > effort? Surely trying to persuade people to contribute to some other project rather than gcc is off-topic here. Even if not, it's pretty hostile. Andrew.