From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-163502-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16241 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2010 00:10:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 16222 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jul 2010 00:10:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:09:58 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC762BAC27;	Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:09:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with LMTP id Io4tyCDhzuXO; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:09:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nile.gnat.com [205.232.38.5])	by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF282BAB7C;	Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:09:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C5369D1.7030302@adacore.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:10:00 -0000
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@spamcop.net>
CC: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,  Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>, iant@google.com, Joe.Buck@synopsys.com, ams@gnu.org, bkoz@redhat.com,  gcc@gcc.gnu.org, richard.guenther@gmail.com, stevenb.gcc@gmail.com
Subject: Re: GFDL/GPL issues
References: <4BFC6EF0.4090908@codesourcery.com>	<20100714172307.3687a9c4@shotwell> <4C48D2C4.5000103@codesourcery.com>	<AANLkTiksONrxGm3sT7_yF8XXQbtHPqhMHSobQ7+0NE_n@mail.gmail.com>	<4C48D60E.3000604@codesourcery.com> <mcraapifvyu.fsf@google.com>	<20100726175013.20b12428@shotwell> <4C4E35B8.6010301@codesourcery.com>	<4C4E37FC.1060208@adacore.com> <4C4F010C.5060401@codesourcery.com>	<20100727180738.GU17485@synopsys.com> <4C4F20E8.5050206@codesourcery.com>	<AANLkTimaPhMzhw66Z6WM+n4dhe1w_ibGFpYExiCym1RC@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTimZo8PZbrhcghxxaHPyEdW-nExj6VoL25WR3os-@mail.gmail.com>	<4C509E54.6090401@codesourcery.com>	<AANLkTim+nkpKL9y2kspaWejfOUd9m7xeo6qFUmNJdp8F@mail.gmail.com>	<E1OeNjt-0004kn-PY@fencepost.gnu.org> <mcriq3yk7lt.fsf@google.com>	<11007291247.AA02219@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>	<4C5195FA.2060208@codesourcery.com> <4C52B176.7040807@adacore.com>	<4C52E1C0.6090400@codesourcery.com> <20100730115402.fmxx5cyvi804owso-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100730115402.fmxx5cyvi804owso-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00437.txt.bz2

Joern Rennecke wrote:

> Actually, the legal definition of fair use / fair dealing that might or might
> not apply depends on the country of residence of the contributer

Not true in the US for sure.

, but if
> RMS says you shouldn't do this, ignoring him is not proper in the context of
> a GNU project 

I agree with that, but as I said in my previous note, it is not clear 
that RMS has given input on the fair use issue in the context of a very
specific case ...