From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32273 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2010 11:08:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 32262 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2010 11:08:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx02.qsc.de (HELO mx02.qsc.de) (213.148.130.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:08:12 +0000 Received: from [192.168.178.22] (port-92-204-46-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.204.46.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684F91E2A5; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:08:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C78EE19.8060703@net-b.de> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:34:00 -0000 From: Tobias Burnus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100714 SUSE/3.1.1 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FX CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Tobias Burnus Subject: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) References: <0016e6498450af8fd1048edf45b1@google.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2 FX wrote: > Tobias' address doesn't accept my mails. Tobias, I hope you get those I send to the list. I have not seen any emails since 9:53 (CEST) at fortran@ - neither directly nor via gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran. > Le 28 août 2010 à 11:58, Mail Delivery Subsystem a écrit : >> Technical details of permanent failure: >> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550-Message rejected because mail-ww0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45] is >> 550-blacklisted at safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net see Currently Sending Spam See: >> 550 http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?74.125.82.45 (state 14). That's a stupid anti-spam measure of my provider. I think I am going to change the provider / mail service. Not even delisting seems to be possible without paying $50 (not to the provider but to the SORBS service) - and my provider refuses to disable the service. It even blocked me once (the dynamic IP was blocked) - because someone else was sending spam 2 years ago ... reconnecting (new IP) worked in that case - as did delisting (after several hours). >> Will do tomorrow. For now I have reverted this line of the patch >> >> Le 28 août 2010 à 10:26, Tobias Burnus a écrit : >>> First question: Will you look at Andrew's patch - or should I do it? I fear we are going to duplicate work. OK. Thus, I either work on it today or leave it to you. Tobias PS: You could use my university address (cf. CC list), which hopefully works.