From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11432 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2010 18:03:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 11421 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Sep 2010 18:03:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:03:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 3350 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2010 18:03:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.105?) (mitchell@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 5 Sep 2010 18:03:37 -0000 Message-ID: <4C83DB83.9080404@codesourcery.com> Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:03:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NightStrike CC: GCC , "Joseph S. Myers" , Richard Guenther , Jakub Jelinek Subject: Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 References: <4C7D26EA.6020807@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 On 9/4/2010 9:23 PM, NightStrike wrote: > We would like x86_64-w64-mingw32 to become a secondary target for 4.6. Who is "we" in this context? > What has to be checked off for that to happen? It's not so much a matter of "checking off". It's a combination of the SC's perception of the importance of the target and the technical stats of the port. I can raise the issue with the SC, if you like, but, personally, I'm not sure that 64-bit Windows is significant enough as a target platform for GCC to merit that status. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery mark@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713