From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22155 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2010 08:47:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 22104 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2010 08:47:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:46:46 +0000 Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so4615824qwa.20 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.14.143 with SMTP id g15mr3468083qca.208.1283849203837; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (nat-pool-brq-t.redhat.com [209.132.186.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t18sm6781436qco.44.2010.09.07.01.46.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C85FBEF.8050609@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:47:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Basile Starynkevitch CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, jeremie.salvucci@free.fr, dnovillo@google.com, iant@google.com, laurynas.biveinis@gmail.com, Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de Subject: Re: who can & want to review gengtype patches? References: <20100907104154.ab8dd486.basile@starynkevitch.net> In-Reply-To: <20100907104154.ab8dd486.basile@starynkevitch.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 On 09/07/2010 10:41 AM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > The words gengtype, GTY, garbage do not seem to appear the > MAINTAINERS file, so it seems that gengtype& GTY don't have any > specialized reviewers. > > And gengtype is not a very well written and easy to maintain piece of > code, at least in our opinion. > > Do we have any chance to have our patch set reviewed (by a person > authorised to OK it) and accepted before end of the stage 1 of > current trunk 4.6? Definitely yes, otherwise that would be a major problem. Paolo