From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15063 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2010 18:05:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 14940 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Mar 2010 18:05:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from portal.icerasemi.com (HELO pOrtaL.icerasemi.com) (213.249.204.90) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:05:45 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1269367540-46d400000000-ThFIni X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.1.243:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from Exchangevs.Icerasemi.com (cluster1.icerasemi.local [192.168.1.203]) by pOrtaL.icerasemi.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 2603CCA56D for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:05:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Exchangevs.Icerasemi.com (cluster1.icerasemi.local [192.168.1.203]) by pOrtaL.icerasemi.com with ESMTP id bpi67VJzCRMcYnaj for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:05:40 +0000 (GMT) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ASG-Orig-Subj: BB reorder forced off for -Os Subject: BB reorder forced off for -Os Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4D60B0700D1DB54A8C0C6E9BE69163700E126D3E@EXCHANGEVS.IceraSemi.local> References: <4D60B0700D1DB54A8C0C6E9BE69163700E08F38E@EXCHANGEVS.IceraSemi.local> <571f6b511003190943r65c1bde8kd0b136fa08504d9a@mail.gmail.com> <4D60B0700D1DB54A8C0C6E9BE69163700E08FFC2@EXCHANGEVS.IceraSemi.local> From: "Ian Bolton" To: X-Barracuda-Connect: cluster1.icerasemi.local[192.168.1.203] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1269367540 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.25587 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2 Is there any reason why BB reorder has been disabled in bb-reorder.c for -Os, such that you can't even turn it on with -freorder-blocks? =46rom what I've heard on this list in recent days, BB reorder gives good performance wins such that most people would still want it on even if it did increase code size a little. Cheers, Ian