From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10677 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2011 18:57:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 10669 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Mar 2011 18:57:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:57:34 +0000 Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so1351368wyb.20 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:57:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.58.130 with SMTP id q2mr1257181wec.57.1299178652306; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:57:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s50sm742671weh.46.2011.03.03.10.57.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:57:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D6FE488.6070004@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:57:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lance Taylor CC: Liu , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, hellogcc Subject: Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern? References: <4D6E4EE8.60200@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 On 02/03/2011 15:14, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Dave Korn writes: > >> On 02/03/2011 07:56, Liu wrote: >> >>> The wrong code is : >>> L9284: ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_LABEL >>> x3 = XEXP (x2, {); >>> if (x3 == const_int_rtx[MAX_SAVED_CONST_INT + (13)]) >>> goto L9285; >>> goto ret0; >> Well, that's coming from here: >> >> else >> printf ("%sx%d = XEXP (x%d, %c);\n", >> indent, depth + 1, depth, newpos[depth]); >> ++depth; > > Interesting. Looks you have a define_insn which has too many entries. > It can only have 26 elements, but, annoyingly, genrecog doesn't check > for that. > > It's a bit odd to have more than 26 elements. Do you have any > incredibly large define_insn patterns? It's that huge parallel full of (const_int)s that OP quoted at us in the first post. cheers, DaveK