From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-169278-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15986 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2011 13:16:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 15957 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jul 2011 13:16:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:15:45 +0000
Received: by wyg30 with SMTP id 30so142079wyg.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.235.234 with SMTP id u84mr5254776weq.51.1310562943979;        Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (93-34-199-31.ip51.fastwebnet.it [93.34.199.31])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k43sm4234284wed.9.2011.07.13.06.15.40        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E1D9A7A.1090608@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:22:00 -0000
From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
CC: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>,  "Paulo J. Matos" <pocmatos@gmail.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: A visualization of GCC's passes, as a subway map
References: <1310406999.23887.34257.camel@surprise>	<4E1BF650.1010503@gnu.org>	<ivh1g2$nbg$1@dough.gmane.org>	<1310486854.23887.35650.camel@surprise>	<4E1D6A21.3020005@gnu.org> <CAFiYyc3_Xt+NkmLBmx3cwkZ9syG6FCHqrBG6gh9ppbnTDwrOaQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc3_Xt+NkmLBmx3cwkZ9syG6FCHqrBG6gh9ppbnTDwrOaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2

On 07/13/2011 12:54 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >  Yes, PROP_gimple_lcx needs to be added to PROP_trees.  I cannot approve the
> >  patch, unfortunately.
>
> Hm, why?  complex operations are lowered after a complex lowering pass
> has executed.  they are still lowered on RTL, so I don't see why we need
> to destroy them technically.

Because it's PROP_*gimple*_lcx. :)

Paolo