From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16349 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2011 23:47:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 16341 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jul 2011 23:47:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:47:31 +0000 Received: by wwj26 with SMTP id 26so1628777wwj.8 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.209.205 with SMTP id gh13mr695243wbb.47.1311292049361; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.111] (bl22-226-189.dsl.telepac.pt [2.83.226.189]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o19sm1442501wbh.60.2011.07.21.16.47.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E28BA8E.6090400@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:05:00 -0000 From: Diogo Sousa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110628 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h References: <4E283680.7040704@gmail.com> <20110721174429.GB12907@synopsys.com> In-Reply-To: <20110721174429.GB12907@synopsys.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE37DABE3FD2F289B4A68989D" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00417.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE37DABE3FD2F289B4A68989D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 959 On 07/21/2011 06:44 PM, Joe Buck wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 07:30:16AM -0700, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Diogo Sousa wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I checked the "library functions in " item in c99status >>> (marked as "Library Issue") [http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html], and it >>> seems that glibc implements everything the standard demands. >>> >>> Am I missing something or is this outdated? If so, where can I find more >>> information about it? >> >> "Library Issue" simply means it's not GCC's resposibility; it says nothi= ng=20 >> about the state in any particular library that may be used with GCC. >=20 > But readers will focus on the word "Issue" here and think that there is > something missing. Perhaps there should be a footnote explaining that > glibc/eglibc has the needed support, but that other libraries might not. >=20 I agree. It should say something as "Library Dependent", and report glibc status. --------------enigE37DABE3FD2F289B4A68989D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 900 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOKLqOAAoJEN6T8FNssaHVeIYQANezP72pK9du/X60VVNIEozm OrmS7F+ctLPzGPkMJSzI5cp0okg9BTaxsKc66GRo/Mz4GHg2G05lyr97jO98BMXz t549TNpdS9v0fi58hbY/DGMMX5SsBc/VLGFJON+3NluaDkNfOgV7YNbLCz8fVYz6 B42HXoRdGjbM9GyT/ta0iIJfFjkp0oAXtHaVmEFPVhbIY5e6Y/4mwTwj44vyDWt9 sTgASANmEbZkSfo62hbx+tzP9eb/g1oo8YHzJdNxH50R5N2aoovuOtxaQbS3LatO +lraK6qORyTG2b+oSs5feWzFabmKyUSw72HMUGvCpwIBCgB+oSz8vI/x2w6qSH00 Y7fD6jA+2wbCn/Xp6+fxNARB8QZwCBERWWm8azLC3vi5HahC+M36miC3rmNlf934 OvKidwd1IO4FarmNAEoeAC/J5IxRdJN6L+GH8twG0QXrcdirE1mJ84sb/0YlbT+i 9235AiLVixRMp0T8/c5pGfX+XVUzhRdJ6A4GqdUl8gaN6CO+QlhNnCvOsMotR+Cr DitbK8gxb1KE9sFQmSm0OTeY5xcaeLwlNrP6WYw5GdM1ZPLiPkOigGA2ww0D/l5G Lo6y8wLk45c3gNl5pP9fxZ309Q5I5a/m7w8ypOP6erSbbZEKPIQD2XpS8efheDZg Dnd7nOCZiYW0KHnK7Dcl =LODo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE37DABE3FD2F289B4A68989D--