From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24830 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2011 10:23:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 24810 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jul 2011 10:23:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-gy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-gy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.160.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:23:38 +0000 Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so2464062gyd.20 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.154.104 with SMTP id g68mr5697094yhk.151.1311589417254; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (93-34-199-31.ip51.fastwebnet.it [93.34.199.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y47sm1739910yha.38.2011.07.25.03.23.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:23:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E2D4425.9040104@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:05:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xinliang David Li CC: Richard Henderson , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove -freorder-blocks-and-partition References: <4E25F810.6050904@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 On 07/25/2011 06:42 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > FYI the performance impact of this option with SPEC06 (built with > google_46 compiler and measured on a core2 box). The base line number > is FDO, and ref number is FDO + reorder_with_partitioning. > > xalancbmk improves> 3.5% > perlbench improves> 1.5% > dealII and bzip2 degrades about 1.4%. > > Note the partitioning scheme is not tuned at all -- there is not even > a tunable parameter to play with. Did you check what is pushed down to the cold section in these cases? Paolo