From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25346 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2011 13:36:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 25335 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2011 13:36:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from 15.mo4.mail-out.ovh.net (HELO mo4.mail-out.ovh.net) (91.121.62.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:36:37 +0000 Received: from mail97.ha.ovh.net (b7.ovh.net [213.186.33.57]) by mo4.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 033A2FF9263 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:37:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Aug 2011 15:36:35 +0200 Received: from aannecy-651-1-9-145.w90-27.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO ?192.168.1.6?) (piervit@pvittet.com@90.27.176.145) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Aug 2011 15:36:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4E4D155D.3040100@pvittet.com> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:36:00 -0000 From: Pierre Vittet User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.4 (mo4.mail-out.ovh.net) Subject: [GSOC] code contribution + documentation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 1540512548749770825 X-Ovh-Remote: 90.27.176.145 (aannecy-651-1-9-145.w90-27.abo.wanadoo.fr) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 20 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfedvkedrtdehucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgfrhhlucfvnfffucdlvddtmd X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00339.txt.bz2 Hello, As GSOC is approching it's end, I would like to get precision of how project's result should be made available. I open a quite general topic however I guess it heavily depends of each project. In particular, if I made some contributions to GCC and MELT, the main part of my project is a plugin. For now it is hosted on a gitorious repository (https://gitorious.org/talpo). As it uses MELT, it will be integrated into MELT branch, as an example tools (I am going to see this with Basile Starynkevitch next week). However I would like to know if it makes sense to have documentation and/or link to Talpo available on the GCC wiki? I guess there should be a link at least in the page referencing existing plugins, I will add it. At the beginning of the GSOC, I created a wiki page about the project as I wanted visibility: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CustomizableWarningPlugin. It is rather outdated now, I should use it as a complete documentation or delete it. What make sense ? I know plugins are often considered external, on the others side this could carries useful information about what a plugin can do, how I used GIMPLE representation... (it might be useful to GCC newcomers and people interested by the plugin). Thanks! Pierre Vittet PS: I you want to know more about my plugin: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-08/msg00251.html https://gitorious.org/talpo/talpo/blobs/master/README