* transactional-memory status
@ 2011-11-07 22:20 Aldy Hernandez
2011-11-08 3:44 ` Richard Guenther
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aldy Hernandez @ 2011-11-07 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc, Joseph S. Myers, Richard Guenther, Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Torvald Riegel, Richard Henderson
Dear Release Managers...
We're pretty much done with the merge blockers, and even suggestions
that weren't blockers :). The only outstanding patch review is a
cleanup by Richard Henderson that is waiting for Richi's review here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01033.html
I am still testing some whitespace changes, but I'm fairly confident in
my ability to hit tab and space bar.
Is there anything else you require of me?
Ideally I'd like a slush, if the merge gets approved. I would do one
last trunk->branch, test, apply the global diff to trunk, and ask for a
slush while I commit. This is, assuming the merge is authorized. I
could also post the last diff before the commit, if it is necessary.
What do you guys think?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: transactional-memory status
2011-11-07 22:20 transactional-memory status Aldy Hernandez
@ 2011-11-08 3:44 ` Richard Guenther
2011-11-08 4:11 ` Aldy Hernandez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Guenther @ 2011-11-08 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aldy Hernandez
Cc: gcc, Joseph S. Myers, Jakub Jelinek, Torvald Riegel, Richard Henderson
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
> Dear Release Managers...
>
> We're pretty much done with the merge blockers, and even suggestions that
> weren't blockers :). The only outstanding patch review is a cleanup by
> Richard Henderson that is waiting for Richi's review here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01033.html
>
> I am still testing some whitespace changes, but I'm fairly confident in my
> ability to hit tab and space bar.
>
> Is there anything else you require of me?
>
> Ideally I'd like a slush, if the merge gets approved. I would do one last
> trunk->branch, test, apply the global diff to trunk, and ask for a slush
> while I commit. This is, assuming the merge is authorized. I could also
> post the last diff before the commit, if it is necessary.
>
> What do you guys think?
I suppose we can freeze for the TM merge once we leave stage1 (thus,
in a few hours).
If you are ready by then, of course, and the tree isn't too broken.
Richard.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: transactional-memory status
2011-11-08 3:44 ` Richard Guenther
@ 2011-11-08 4:11 ` Aldy Hernandez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aldy Hernandez @ 2011-11-08 4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Guenther
Cc: gcc, Joseph S. Myers, Jakub Jelinek, Torvald Riegel, Richard Henderson
> I suppose we can freeze for the TM merge once we leave stage1 (thus,
> in a few hours).
> If you are ready by then, of course, and the tree isn't too broken.
>
> Richard.
Fine by me. In the meantime we will stabilize things on the branch,
merge from trunk, run tests, and have a patch ready to be applied to the
trunk once I get the go-ahead by you.
Thank you guys for your diligent reviews.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-07 23:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-07 22:20 transactional-memory status Aldy Hernandez
2011-11-08 3:44 ` Richard Guenther
2011-11-08 4:11 ` Aldy Hernandez
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).