From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-173491-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29072 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2012 10:56:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 29064 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2012 10:55:59 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:55:47 +0000
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q35Atllq016711	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 06:55:47 -0400
Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-75.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.75])	by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q35Atjhr027350;	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 06:55:46 -0400
Message-ID: <4F7D7A31.20402@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:56:00 -0000
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC: -Wall by default
References: <CAAiZkiDuX94Qf3-1EONGVnxX4nsxhdHLemg9kSZRVVaarTQ-OA@mail.gmail.com> <4F7C39B2.6060802@redhat.com> <mcr398jv93g.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com> <4F7C6606.7020406@redhat.com> <CAAiZkiC0onmhOTjoppN4D5a=uFvWyGnrpXdu4x+XHHcKDJtdcQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F7C8DB0.6030500@redhat.com> <CAAiZkiCfrtqLPiOr+OfLdg2Wg6ASmXhnZy1GVkAB_9+4bCOuLA@mail.gmail.com> <4F7C9A87.2050907@redhat.com> <20120405105038.GA24555@xvii.vinc17.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120405105038.GA24555@xvii.vinc17.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2

On 04/05/2012 11:50 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-04-04 20:01:27 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 04/04/2012 07:11 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>> Really?  Such as what?
>>
>> Such as "I wrote a perfectly legal C program, and gcc spewed out
>> a ton of messages."
> 
> What's a "legal C program"?

It's generally used to mean one that is fully defined by the
specifications in effect, often some combination of POSIX and ISO C,
with perhaps some vendor extensions.  Why do you ask?

Andrew.