From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29462 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2005 22:14:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29453 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2005 22:14:51 -0000 Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net) (203.16.214.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:14:51 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.106] (ppp114-61.static.internode.on.net [150.101.114.61]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6TMEaMJ007725; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:44:38 +0930 (CST) In-Reply-To: <1122649613.12852.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org> References: <1122649613.12852.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4F837438-B914-4C70-8740-5AB8DFD0FD68@internode.on.net> Cc: howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu, geoffk@geoffk.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bill Northcott Subject: Re: could gfortran be tested on Darwin regress builds of 4.1? Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:14:00 -0000 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01238.txt.bz2 On 30/07/2005, at 1:06 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Well the gcc4.info for the package containing gfortran in fink > has... > > Depends: gmp-shlibs (>= 4.1.3-11), cctools (>= 576-1) | odcctools > (>= 576-200503 > 27), %N-shlibs, libiconv > BuildDepends: gmp (>= 4.1.3-11), libiconv-dev > > which is a tad confusing since I guess it implies that cctools > isn't needed > to build gcc4/gfortran but is needed to use it. That seems weird > since to > build it and do a make check is to effectively use it. > I built a working (builds functioning R and Octave) gfortran with Apple's gcc 4 on MacOS X 10.4.1 (Darwin 8.1). The only thing I needed to add was gmp, which built from the source without problems. The cc-tools in Darwin 8 is 590. So I think it would be a bad idea to install 576! If I get time, I will try the current code. Bill Northcott