From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20999 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2012 13:08:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 20987 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2012 13:08:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:08:05 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id jg15so4368545bkc.20 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:08:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=5zHzGEdnUKNWWJAyvtFyr7eC8XVT3ZkA7sfb4sRxMi0=; b=l79SWF8GjBEQxX8+4GwdXaHiheFRL8Ct6eYVTq0gy7N0ASvEp5uAYio3AwFm2HFeOQ I+j4NEhdhAHL3afXB7TLVvYtZQfJrHGjSMIs0S2Y3fwFSOpLwhg9HP+PLRQ1Vl3PXtDZ XIJOPp91oDKbPOO3/z3YkKp+57kFvnbsnv+iPC67TsWo5Bt+271zCpXBQRb/Jaf5gKfA kcA7tPxaZBPGQ73s3rV9V47yhM7JiqLozgjcIBcJyEJG/C4zLAEHug083Gjy21fvdf2L +0VtOOmkurl6aDr5jBr8RAAKsFeyIyWSmPQyMk5HF73vX7AuLeAYPGMVniugLwIQ6mNl YiMg== Received: by 10.205.139.67 with SMTP id iv3mr4745378bkc.8.1334063284674; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.139.67 with SMTP id iv3mr4745364bkc.8.1334063284462; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-192-168-147-176.mtv.corp.google.com ([74.125.122.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z17sm36114355bkw.12.2012.04.10.06.08.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F8430A7.8010108@google.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:08:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NightStrike CC: gcc Subject: Re: RFH - Testing targets for the switch to C++ References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmv0LguzaeQyQwc9HmD91phJ8sK5YnxjkfcK4nJbwJ0AIylroLr9q7FdcnrtK0Bp0JuAM+4cCjHpliyNsveHiCzl34XRE0vChPOHM2oyf0tF9VqAdhPkCbbFl9OujjXCuDm2yK/jP5K3bNKlpZ9OB7Kto31EeD9sh4zA5ZF+u4/r/fBwaA= X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2 On 4/10/12 9:04 AM, NightStrike wrote: > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: >> My plea for help is to everyone who has access to the targets >> mentioned in the list: please follow the instructions in that page and >> fill-in the table entries of the targets that you tested. >> >> If you see a missing target that should be tested, by all means, add >> it to the list. > > I will test all of the mingw-w64 host/target combinations once trunk > doesn't cause an ICE again (should be soon with Kai's recent patch). > I'll add them to your list as I test them. Excellent, thanks. Diego.