From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20667 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2012 13:49:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 20643 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2012 13:49:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:49:11 +0000 Received: by bkcjg15 with SMTP id jg15so4415021bkc.20 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:49:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=3PsfgSSAmA6bPjbsEdRGZebFGtAbC9KZSXlIYMP19WE=; b=epNkEt5ggMPFi29XkiuQ0R6mGH1LQmYLfLHF/8sqCL8bvIC1fY+fiySvxTS4CeWnhh q/agrkhnTU95YsA8d5PvPmdm2D4SnvLpRJ2q2/k6M9/sMWU+YhkpgGkS8KumQf1W6M3F /s62Ba4ZumUMTqNHPfmK6Q7eSwgdyYFP2A+fUyucMTmIaUoxu8ggi0xkjCPVRB3hIt68 ANuYFGGcu41+deTSkmnMeCxGx2G7KhEEA1QCLyGKIctrNM3sL1b3iyV4uPWf/0etUvoW 4qGQ/0z3qiOMDzjRw1W1Wj+3/MREqxn9p/nzu2+yVNSa2R6n7RzN48Q0aYVYc7tyOBxr Xy9A== Received: by 10.205.139.77 with SMTP id iv13mr4668070bkc.91.1334065749350; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.139.77 with SMTP id iv13mr4668059bkc.91.1334065749188; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-192-168-147-176.mtv.corp.google.com ([74.125.122.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jr13sm36367788bkb.14.2012.04.10.06.49.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F843A52.8060802@google.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:49:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NightStrike CC: gcc Subject: Re: RFH - Testing targets for the switch to C++ References: <4F8430A7.8010108@google.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlRSXK4FGhVpXLvkI9L/S1O3A/jeubxK3O5ckAKPtRRqwVCOU4hbG5q0tPQ8GKnidEfLt5arIKY2u0l9z9OLWH0JlOFb3hVXXwWtTC7HKwszIll+DmDUnXZgwKDX93mklfTIZf8Azd34HVP6xpsTRjYo7stOiPa7/hW7iSAumHyoReAm2w= X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 On 4/10/12 9:27 AM, NightStrike wrote: > Do these have to be tested as native compilers or cross compilers? It doesn't really matter. As long as stage 1 is built with the host C++ compiler, either type of build should be fine. Diego.