From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15374 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2012 15:31:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 15359 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2012 15:31:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-yw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:30:49 +0000 Received: by yhjj56 with SMTP id j56so549393yhj.20 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:30:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=UchOQKqv12ZsLqoJn3KENHVOot0hkt8JlvteqsJoxHo=; b=FBueBv7CTeMK7QPmDFHYYzlw+aFUOKpOLtBx6H4+oRc06mh18B/yZbRFRj0ZmkLbEb tDEfZDkCwbkzm3l5k/A8nMZF4i2gXldgAY63hzhhqOEkBNehM7jiyxgN0fOxgF3w5b87 8FbE1BTfIFFJb7YMGa63HRe3N5SLsMqoVxhJON1N7PIAdrn176nvb5oH114Xc0v4UmOa lxfdVZgLeBBb2bFbwxqbDocPPOkva53MWKSyjQ5yOJ7avqW0uscNPwSEHKFTAGMhiUWE exYm/b/SGr0yMiWns0jTmKZeFG7AglBKPZ9R9PU0Lhn6D15dv+yFzGLxpENd9BERnwjo px0g== Received: by 10.236.170.71 with SMTP id o47mr13250517yhl.104.1334158248938; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.170.71 with SMTP id o47mr13250505yhl.104.1334158248840; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dnovillo-macbookpro.local ([72.14.228.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o6sm5054041ank.2.2012.04.11.08.30.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F85A3A6.1070906@google.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:31:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rainer Orth CC: gcc Subject: Re: RFH - Testing targets for the switch to C++ References: <4F8451F3.8040001@google.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVCFxlSixzGXNP6mfvT5HIe8qpyqVzxDw6jbo/sp95qYfLENqQtaP3z1vWGkjkQJ69S86HKIso3W6ELkvA8NG8nLqJN0fnwPKyGQuyZrHRxrZ2/E0btX7E0BY21wqyy8wBhn/E8sYjAtPocCo/VUDz1I7S37WUg87WDPN20rCIRPsAd64= X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00422.txt.bz2 On 4/11/12 11:19 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > Diego Novillo writes: > >> On 4/10/12 10:35 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: >> >>> sparc-sun-solaris2.11 in progress, could add other OS versions (Solaris >>> 9 to 11) if desired. >> >> That would be great, particularly if they use different host C++ compilers. > > The sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap also completed successfully. I > don't think there's much point in repeating the exercise on other > Solaris versions right now, given that they would all be built with the > same g++ version, CC doesn't yet work anywhere, and the amount of > discussion about how/if to perform the transition. Sounds goods. Thanks for all the help! Diego.