From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-173768-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8380 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2012 18:41:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 8364 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2012 18:41:26 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:41:11 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3BIf6fT004277	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:41:06 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3BIf3OJ021274;	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:41:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4F85D03F.20408@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:41:00 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
CC: Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>,        Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,        Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>,        Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,        Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>,        Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,        David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,        Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>, gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Switching to C++ by default in 4.8
References: <4F7B356E.9080003@google.com>	<CAGWvnymDHXtN1AR9hdrYpV7UVw-rkk5ZiM0kS9DbVLY24xQ-6Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAiZkiA29bnrEHg3jHyOtmdFo1HewaW-rp3KYOKC+gfEQ1pXzA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0wG3ha4B4BgA6g4NPnBG6Pj3iuMZ+_B+3AOgBkKvXpLg@mail.gmail.com>	<4F7C35A3.3080207@codesourcery.com>	<CAFiYyc0knheu7jRBUd5Vtva5Bj7GBypzCQ9BFmFYGXzLcFBYGA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAkRFZ+4RfHszKh50DW1wKSis0wo3516Hy8626FNpYwgGWdABQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20120410084614.GJ6148@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1204101425310.25409@wotan.suse.de>	<CAAkRFZJp0TbK_nCEvfPrvekhQ2m8Ywj9jrBa121dY2q4pHxOVg@mail.gmail.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1204101814180.25409@wotan.suse.de>	<1334078968.11195.64.camel@triegel.csb>	<CAFiYyc1=-E5GhLU1_pgWooDNOfB4Hb4MynTEF1pgfAiUrHXHKg@mail.gmail.com>	<1334149073.3101.23.camel@triegel.csb>	<CAFiYyc3N7MzW06nSiJgmZ5HR7qYFcXkR=Yz_z6a_s2m+ciGAMQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAkRFZ+4apO-5t0B7QsBUakB2HFfeuc=YAze3gfU6e9zmix3yQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6eHdQO9ex9ms-rdoakLbdYgvQPx=AxOiTjg4qrFMuTHE1OcA@mail.gmail.! com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdQO9ex9ms-rdoakLbdYgvQPx=AxOiTjg4qrFMuTHE1OcA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00445.txt.bz2

On 04/11/2012 07:26 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

> GCC's diagnostics have got a lot better recently.
> 
> The http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html page compares clang's
> diagnostics to GCC 4.2, which was outdated long before that page was
> written.
> 
> It doesn't help GCC's cause when people keep repeating that outdated info :-)


Spelling out the obvious, IWBVN if someone from the gcc camp did a
similar comparison using a current gcc.  Is there such a page somewhere?

-- 
Pedro Alves