From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8204 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2012 19:48:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 8194 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2012 19:48:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_CX,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-gx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.161.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:48:08 +0000 Received: by ggcy3 with SMTP id y3so764619ggc.20 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=OjN2LB8OzA2R4ideXm93VnDE9Mlkh+bZM7T6fJ1GSZ4=; b=KyPe6J5EfIr5sapRH/qGuk7/gKPeFk4VfJdM5Y1+1DgZKIw4zmTLmihgdBytK2qMI4 mj7YXHQ0b140KsZ6ic0JxFlZREDDssGzTuyIlyRR2hmS1hEgFqrWLwz3fwhS/RUE28MD JVa+ChvIT11uNGGN8lOcd4diGCGBdM49ltHEuwXEZr6ZJaXvD+CCS2B9MPjHTGQVmdie nW40IBtmGO6BIUGQh2M2tc7I4jKSAQu1CqxFMEW2jh9/kDfENCO9HtNotitNs/RQzouP 6XuT/o34/95TabbfH77rYcfZyuMiev1MPWNtRebxLmsHu3C85QCpCiM4mEoqxvuNeTpj umZA== Received: by 10.236.184.202 with SMTP id s50mr14164180yhm.84.1334173688311; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.184.202 with SMTP id s50mr14164159yhm.84.1334173688213; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dnovillo-macbookpro.local ([72.14.228.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p15sm6235586ani.15.2012.04.11.12.48.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F85DFF5.5050709@google.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:48:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIFNpa29yYQ==?= CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, pedro.lamarao@gmail.com, Ian Lance Taylor , Lawrence Crowl Subject: Re: Converting GCC to C++ - new branch cxx-conversion References: <20120411163516.GA32717@google.com> <1369197.2kBSDVHZzt@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1369197.2kBSDVHZzt@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlymJcdM31/rEFrlM8N0fM5C9TmLRrEo40cNyALxRhe3yLhCIG+rPdu8Zp2/6HiOMzm5KdraPHw217IbFFl8XPm3+4wKU/2lAHZYPiuQLcRY9VPbPHuZPE+hLPlUcPAZo/0zNSuqY1ZpwmzKre8oYQqVBFiymHPRuWfDDvYDegD3GX8L3s= X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00452.txt.bz2 On 4/11/12 3:44 PM, Paweł Sikora wrote: > will this project use (new) gcc mailing list or should we poison ;) > the core gcc@ list with [cxx-conversion] marker? This is no different than any other development branch. We use tagging to distinguish patches and messages related to it. Diego.