From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-173848-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22583 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 19:42:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 22573 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 19:42:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:42:38 +0000
Received: by obbuo13 with SMTP id uo13so3566310obb.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc         :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type         :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;        bh=T56JEeDxRfsStJEeC1zp4MfzZmkCsYv/3TxdnL4m6V4=;        b=c1GEFDE2RInJtRbJLy9Xxq9WVcy8XrQIZNmasiUwCy4y+dvoA5LHFPx9y1Cme+LuFy         oiw+QLQJ2g9WMESWi7vuk+fksUdsxzvMqCEZ7GYPKPOyrzGkjROXk4u2E0QwNUftc8sz         EsLhptaTat8riOSuIpRQUwRn/0PAwIlKOmX/KnjsQPQaAhztOemgST1cIf+EbnsJGKZU         SQ/gySY5L5msT78FWWpyrIdYBsypwV0YpxDqnjZaZ/gjrXGPn6gEyA9aNlua0iuC8+s0         paeN6mFDnLG9AIEWAInzlDcUYArizx/yMGXeD3ahEB0KJ1Mzq+80stejdzTWxa9GShoJ         0qhw==
Received: by 10.182.31.102 with SMTP id z6mr4651094obh.78.1334259758052;        Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.31.102 with SMTP id z6mr4651057obh.78.1334259757856;        Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-172-29-42-217.tor.corp.google.com ([2620:0:101b:9:e2f8:47ff:fe39:637a])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n9sm6428828oen.2.2012.04.12.12.42.35        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F873029.7000807@google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:42:00 -0000
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
CC: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,  Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>,  Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>,  David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, Lawrence Crowl <crowl@google.com>
Subject: Re: Switching to C++ by default in 4.8
References: <4F7B356E.9080003@google.com>	<CAGWvnymDHXtN1AR9hdrYpV7UVw-rkk5ZiM0kS9DbVLY24xQ-6Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAiZkiA29bnrEHg3jHyOtmdFo1HewaW-rp3KYOKC+gfEQ1pXzA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0wG3ha4B4BgA6g4NPnBG6Pj3iuMZ+_B+3AOgBkKvXpLg@mail.gmail.com>	<4F7C35A3.3080207@codesourcery.com>	<CAFiYyc0knheu7jRBUd5Vtva5Bj7GBypzCQ9BFmFYGXzLcFBYGA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAkRFZ+4RfHszKh50DW1wKSis0wo3516Hy8626FNpYwgGWdABQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20120410084614.GJ6148@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>	<CAAkRFZKFu234Q7+Rm+DRpDJPe9Rr0jtxh26sZWVVeEE1mCDfwg@mail.gmail.com>	<20120410163905.GK6148@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>	<CAAiZkiACxHi24=UkNJu5W3VcE7dWssF-giY6dFyf1XWvC-Oxqg@mail.gmail.com>	<4F8463EF.5090400@google.com> <87iph4zql1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <87iph4zql1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn8vp857/dmFkVBilRn842VNbVEdcB7fR0xY3p8tycK8G8a5D4BXbxuUQuf1WB/bfKKIm671uVYEx4dq0zvrMoD3v6/dQjlv0nT2FftJfAo8VcNlw5tg9vrv0sHCeczulihNDVm87OB8r+hjII/NB7DWzfarTc0vzNqXRZsI9w/NWpwEg0=
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00525.txt.bz2

On 4/12/12 3:40 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Diego" == Diego Novillo<dnovillo@google.com>  writes:
>
> Diego>  Tom, I'm thinking of that patch on black listing functions.  There was
> Diego>  also the idea of a command that would only step in the outermost
> Diego>  function call of an expression.
>
> That patch went in.  The new command is called "skip".

Nice!  What version of gdb has this support?


> I don't think anybody has worked on stepping into just the outermost
> function call of an expression.

I think we can workaround most issues with 'skip'.


Thanks.  Diego.