From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14746 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2017 16:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14724 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jan 2017 16:45:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:sk:3372609, H*i:sk:3372609, H*f:sk:3372609, H*M:5475 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:45:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCAD561BB6; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-118-153.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.118.153]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v06Gjqlm012876; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:45:53 -0500 Subject: Re: input address reload issue To: Eric Botcazou References: <094e7c3d-fc6c-1b0a-29c3-263cadec25a7@gmail.com> <33726095.fyrHg716SA@polaris> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Aurelien Buhrig , Segher Boessenkool From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <4dc39766-bcbd-5475-0d27-84e5b30bc12b@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:46:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <33726095.fyrHg716SA@polaris> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 On 01/06/2017 09:37 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> I would suggesting moving away from cc0 first. cc0 is an abomination >> and should have been abolished years ago -- the only reason is many old >> ports would break and nobody's taken the time to convert them or propose >> them for deprecation. > > It's 8 out of 47 ports, most of them old indeed, with the exception of AVR. > You're probably thinking of m68k, but AVR seems to be more blocking here. I didn't have any particular port in mind, but yes, of the cc0 ports AVR is probably the most active. jeff