From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25953 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 16:06:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25829 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 16:06:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO postino.fi.infn.it) (192.84.145.9) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 16:06:06 -0000 Received: from pc213-02.inwind.it (pc213-02.fi.infn.it [193.206.190.187]) by postino.fi.infn.it (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h02G5iR9006847; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 17:05:45 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030102165747.00b27e20@popmail.inwind.it> X-Sender: fwyzard@popmail.inwind.it (Unverified) Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:06:00 -0000 To: Nicola Pero From: "Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci" Subject: Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Cc: Matthias Klose , gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030102162946.00b27d60@popmail.libero.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.1(snapshot 20020920) (postino.fi.infn.it) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.9 tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.43 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 At 15.48 02/01/2003 +0000, Nicola Pero wrote: > > So, yes, I think it's intended, but I don't know why. > >I don't know either ... I don't remember - maybe a historical leftover ? > >I think if shared libraries are supported, libobjc should be built as >shared. It should definitely be built as shared, why building it >statically ? A static libobjc is usually more of a problem than a shared >one! I don't actually use, ObjC, so I don't really know about it But I always build with --enable-shared, just to be sure :-) Maybe some Knowledgeable Person here can aswer that... fwyzard