From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Per Bothner <bothner@cygnus.com>
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: bcopy -> memcpy/memmove transition proposal 
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 23:53:00 -0000
Message-id: <5083.906187948@hurl.cygnus.com>
References: <199809170708.AAA23506@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 1998-09/msg01100.html

  In message < 199809170708.AAA23506@cygnus.com >you write:
  > 1) Do we need to add prototypes for bcopy, memmove and/or memcpy
  > to some header file, if they are "missing"?
I'd say no, but others will likely disagree :-)


  > 2) Is there a problem with build vs host?  Is is the difference
  > between auto-host.h and auto-config.h?  I'm not clear on how
  > this happens;  perhaps we may need to compile string.c twice,
  > once for build and once for host.
string.c will need to be compiled twice, once for the host, once
for the build (if performing a canadian cross).  There's sample
rules in the Makefile.in to do this.

Note you may need a little sed command to change config.h to hconfig.h
when compiling it for the host (using gcc backwards gcc terminology)


jeff