From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-179272-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12786 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2013 16:02:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12771 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jul 2013 16:02:50 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 16:02:50 +0000
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r66G2m00031173	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Sat, 6 Jul 2013 12:02:48 -0400
Received: from zebedee.pink ([10.3.113.16])	by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r66G2l9l030923;	Sat, 6 Jul 2013 12:02:47 -0400
Message-ID: <51D83FA6.8040705@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 16:02:00 -0000
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>
CC: GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
References: <51D83AAC.4080200@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51D83AAC.4080200@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2

On 07/06/2013 04:41 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Why is it that configure worked but stubs-32.h was not found?
> Googling leads me to:
>> > You're missing the 32 bit libc dev package:
> but the configure step should detect that

The trouble with making suggestions like this is that someone will ask
you for a patch.  Hint: getting this right for every corner case is
not easy.  Patches welcome.

> and object before this otherwise obscure message comes up.  Since
> one has to find and select this stuff from an extensive list of
> packages every time there is a new distribution, it is easy to
> overlook....

Or --disable-multilib.

Andrew.