From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-179535-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16695 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2013 08:17:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16684 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2013 08:17:40 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:17:39 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6O8HWC0019595	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 24 Jul 2013 04:17:32 -0400
Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-140.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.140])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6O8HTMD019277;	Wed, 24 Jul 2013 04:17:30 -0400
Message-ID: <51EF8D98.3060005@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:17:00 -0000
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
References: <CAMZ=zj40GLLXB0toTGhpJihm--eMYMd643SOVGcPUg+LpRuZ8g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMZ=zj40GLLXB0toTGhpJihm--eMYMd643SOVGcPUg+LpRuZ8g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00339.txt.bz2

On 07/24/2013 01:48 AM, David Starner wrote:
> I'd like to mention that I too was bit by this one on Debian. I don't
> have a 32-bit development environment installed; why would I? I'm
> building primarily for myself, and if I did have to target a 32-bit
> environment, I'd likely have to mess with more stuff then just the
> compiler.

No, you probably wouldn't.  Just use -m32 and you'd be fine.

> If you can't find a way to detect this error, I can't
> imagine many people would have a problem with turning off multilibs on
> x86-64; it's something of a minority setup.

I don't think it is, really.

Andrew.