From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13248 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2013 13:44:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13238 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2013 13:44:25 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:44:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6ODiI6U027649 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:44:18 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-140.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.140]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6ODiG6J013284; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:44:17 -0400 Message-ID: <51EFDA30.8020303@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:44:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Starner CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file References: <51EF8D98.3060005@redhat.com> <51EFB70C.3050309@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00351.txt.bz2 On 07/24/2013 01:26 PM, David Starner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> I would just install GCC's build dependencies and build with the >> defaults. > > I'm glad you have infinite hard-drive space. I rather wish fewer > developers did, as well as those infinitely fast computers they seem > to have; perhaps they would have more empathy with my day-to-day > computing needs. > >> There is no resistance whatsoever to making it work with real systems >> and real workloads. > > Yes, there is. Both in this thread, and on bugzilla, people with real > systems, in my case a well-stocked development system, have said they > started compiling gcc and after hours the compile has failed without > even an explanation, and people have shrugged, and said what do you > want us to do about it? There should be a better diagnostic. Andrew.