From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>, FX <fxcoudert@gmail.com>,
"gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
"jwakely.gcc@gmail.com" <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F7CED2.5000001@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZ=zj5kP=A2uoZpQ2ALQpadcjvnd8ZTyGTb6cP25e4UdZh97g@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/30/2013 01:52 PM, David Starner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
>> "We" is the GCC community. "We" really want multilibs to be built so
>> they get tested as much as possible. It's in the best interest of
>> all GCC users that this happens.
>
> "We" really want Ada to be built so that it gets tested as much as
> possible. "We" really want ARM to be built so that it gets tested as
> much as possible. I don't see the distinction. Those who need
> multilibs support should be responsible for making sure that it works
> right. Presumably enough people do need it. Those that don't should
> have to shoulder the burden for those who do.
The burden of typing "--disable-multilib".
>> So don't write one. Then you're likely to be proved right.
>
> So what you're saying is that "we" don't care if people can easily
> build "our" compiler.
No. I'm saying that you care enough to argue but not enough to write
a patch. If you really wanted to change the status quo that's what
you'd have done by now.
Andrew.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-28 13:24 FX
2013-07-29 13:06 ` FX
2013-07-29 13:23 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-29 13:55 ` Bruce Korb
2013-07-29 14:20 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-30 4:28 ` David Starner
2013-07-30 4:50 ` David Starner
2013-07-30 4:58 ` Andrew Pinski
2013-07-30 13:13 ` David Starner
2013-07-30 7:56 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-30 12:52 ` David Starner
2013-07-30 14:34 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
2013-07-30 11:06 ` Michael Veksler
2013-07-30 13:54 ` FX
2013-07-31 19:44 ` Matthias Klose
2013-07-31 20:14 ` Jonathan Wakely
2013-07-31 20:23 ` Russ Allbery
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-24 0:48 David Starner
2013-07-24 8:17 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-24 8:36 ` Florian Weimer
2013-07-24 8:39 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-24 9:05 ` Florian Weimer
2013-07-24 9:18 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-24 10:32 ` David Starner
2013-07-24 11:14 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-24 12:26 ` David Starner
2013-07-24 13:44 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-24 12:37 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-24 13:45 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-24 15:38 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-24 15:50 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-24 22:52 ` David Starner
2013-07-25 8:17 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-26 0:00 ` David Starner
2013-07-26 9:01 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-27 13:56 ` David Starner
2013-07-27 19:23 ` Jonathan Wakely
2013-07-27 22:54 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-27 23:10 ` David Starner
2013-07-27 23:53 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-06 15:41 Bruce Korb
2013-07-06 16:02 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-06 16:09 ` Bruce Korb
2013-07-06 18:53 ` Andreas Schwab
2013-07-07 14:00 ` Bruce Korb
2013-07-07 17:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
2013-07-07 20:33 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-07 23:02 ` Jonathan Wakely
2013-07-08 5:17 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-08 5:19 ` Andrew Pinski
2013-07-08 5:55 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-08 5:59 ` Andrew Pinski
2013-07-08 6:33 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-08 8:43 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-08 9:00 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-08 7:13 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-07-08 7:18 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-08-14 8:53 ` Alexandre Oliva
2013-08-14 16:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2013-08-14 19:01 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-08 15:11 ` Bruce Korb
2013-07-08 15:24 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-07-08 15:39 ` Bruce Korb
2013-07-08 17:27 ` Jonathan Wakely
2013-07-08 18:08 ` Bruce Korb
2013-07-16 9:40 ` Florian Weimer
2013-07-16 12:46 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-16 13:24 ` Jonathan Wakely
2013-07-16 14:26 ` Andrew Pinski
2013-07-16 14:35 ` Bruce Korb
2013-07-16 15:04 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-16 15:11 ` Jonathan Wakely
2013-07-16 15:13 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-07-16 15:40 ` Bruce Korb
2013-07-08 8:42 ` Andrew Haley
2013-07-07 20:31 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F7CED2.5000001@redhat.com \
--to=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=bruce.korb@gmail.com \
--cc=fxcoudert@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=prosfilaes@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).