From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: "Víctor Martínez" <pitillo@crux-arm.nu>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libitm.a and sjlj.o object
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523C67B4.5000606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <523195E2.3030003@crux-arm.nu>
On 09/12/2013 03:22 AM, VÃctor MartÃnez wrote:
> Why is sjlj.o the only one built for armv4 while the rest of objects are armv5t?
> Is this behaviour expected? Or is there something wrong trying to configure gcc
> with these options?
There are co-processor instructions in there that can't be encoded with thumb1,
as present on armv5t. It is as expected.
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-20 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-12 10:22 Víctor Martínez
2013-09-20 15:20 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2013-09-20 16:27 ` Victor Martinez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523C67B4.5000606@redhat.com \
--to=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=pitillo@crux-arm.nu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).