From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9093 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2013 16:27:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9080 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2013 16:27:18 -0000 Received: from 2.net-176-57-111.almatv.es (HELO mail.crux-arm.nu) (176.57.111.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:27:18 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.crux-arm.nu Received: by mail.crux-arm.nu (Postfix, from userid 202) id 83F4934A009; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:25:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.204] (244.Red-79-155-113.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.155.113.244]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.crux-arm.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EE0734A007; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:25:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <523C7729.8040409@crux-arm.nu> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:27:00 -0000 From: Victor Martinez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120919 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Henderson CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libitm.a and sjlj.o object References: <523195E2.3030003@crux-arm.nu> <523C67B4.5000606@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <523C67B4.5000606@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 On 09/20/13 17:20, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/12/2013 03:22 AM, Víctor Martínez wrote: >> Why is sjlj.o the only one built for armv4 while the rest of objects are armv5t? >> Is this behaviour expected? Or is there something wrong trying to configure gcc >> with these options? > There are co-processor instructions in there that can't be encoded with thumb1, > as present on armv5t. It is as expected. > > > r~ Thank you very much for the clarification. -- Learning bit by bit Victor Martinez | http://lokalix.dyndns.org