From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-180330-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12598 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2013 08:32:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12588 invoked by uid 89); 2 Oct 2013 08:32:06 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 08:32:06 +0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r928VkTB031526	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 2 Oct 2013 04:31:47 -0400
Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-102.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.102])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r928Vg2a032607;	Wed, 2 Oct 2013 04:31:43 -0400
Message-ID: <524BD9EE.1080300@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 08:32:00 -0000
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130912 Thunderbird/17.0.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
CC: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@embecosm.com>,        Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,        jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com, David Edelsohn <edelsohn@gnu.org>,        GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted
References: <5249A23F.8000901@embecosm.com>	<CAFiYyc0Uo_UOo6tBSVtXJK4giQLiL6BhWWJA3=grds8deA3qMA@mail.gmail.com>	<524A9173.30301@redhat.com>	<CAFiYyc3ZJe_1XOOY5MeRD4UjOnc=KS9B1eTrgjPATT4OHNC-=A@mail.gmail.com>	<524ACD05.2020701@redhat.com>	<CAFiYyc1q+hEeL5L2bwU_8fMW4SDSYBKdyG-xikRK_cgHF=mAkw@mail.gmail.com>	<20131001101941.n710f8j688owg4oo-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>	<524AE8FF.2010101@redhat.com> <CAGWvny=r1=CSaPt+Vtj_rP2wdiKP8F9TOuKMEnJ6g0iA=NTuxQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGWvny=r1=CSaPt+Vtj_rP2wdiKP8F9TOuKMEnJ6g0iA=NTuxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2

On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> It is unfortunate that global reviewers are so busy that they cannot
> review the few, infrequent new port submissions. But I find it very
> distasteful for someone to hyperventilate because other, busy people
> don't do something that appears obvious. 

I'm sure you do, but I find it far more distasteful to have a willing
volunteer blocked for so long under such circumstances.  This is not
the way that we should be doing things.

Andrew.