* Request for bugmasters
@ 2004-12-01 18:09 Mark Mitchell
2004-12-01 18:41 ` Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 2004-12-01 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Bugmasters --
Would it be possible for you to classify regressions against secondary
platforms (and, yes, the SC is talking about updating that list!) as P3?
Since the list is out of date, I'd be very happy for you to use your
judgement, but things like MMIX, M68K, etc., would definitely qualify.
Thanks in advance for your help!
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Request for bugmasters
2004-12-01 18:09 Request for bugmasters Mark Mitchell
@ 2004-12-01 18:41 ` Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2004-12-01 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Mitchell; +Cc: gcc
On Dec 1, 2004, at 1:08 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Bugmasters --
>
> Would it be possible for you to classify regressions against secondary
> platforms (and, yes, the SC is talking about updating that list!) as
> P3? Since the list is out of date, I'd be very happy for you to use
> your judgement, but things like MMIX, M68K, etc., would definitely
> qualify.
I did some, I assumed that most emended targets qualify as non primary
targets. I did not touch the arm bug since it had not been confirmed
yet.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-01 18:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-01 18:09 Request for bugmasters Mark Mitchell
2004-12-01 18:41 ` Andrew Pinski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).