From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-181808-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6448 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2014 17:40:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6437 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jan 2014 17:40:41 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:40:40 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0UFo1Et018282	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:50:02 -0500
Received: from stumpy.slc.redhat.com ([10.3.113.19])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0UFo0Pq017647;	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:50:00 -0500
Message-ID: <52EA74A8.4060303@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:07:00 -0000
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paulo Matos <pmatos@broadcom.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
CC: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Regression [v850,mep...]: sign_extend in loop breaks zero-overhead loop generation
References: <19EB96622A777C4AB91610E763265F463F2F43@SJEXCHMB14.corp.ad.broadcom.com>	<87bnytk0fs.fsf@igel.home>	<19EB96622A777C4AB91610E763265F463F3030@SJEXCHMB14.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <871tzpjycb.fsf@igel.home> <19EB96622A777C4AB91610E763265F463F30B5@SJEXCHMB14.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <19EB96622A777C4AB91610E763265F463F30B5@SJEXCHMB14.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2

On 01/30/14 08:19, Paulo Matos wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andreas Schwab [mailto:schwab@linux-m68k.org]
>> Sent: 30 January 2014 15:15
>> To: Paulo Matos
>> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: Regression [v850,mep...]: sign_extend in loop breaks zero-overhead
>> loop generation
>>
>> Paulo Matos <pmatos@broadcom.com> writes:
>>
>>> If instead I write:
>>> void
>>> foo (short blockSize)
>>> {
>>>    short i;
>>>    unsigned short loopCount;
>>>    loopCount = (unsigned short) (blockSize + delayLength) % 8;
>>>    for (i = 0; i < loopCount; i++)
>>>        *temp_ptr++ = x ^ *temp_ptr;
>>> }
>>
>> This is still undefined.
>>
>
> OK, of course. Don't know what I am doing today.
> It's undefined because 'i' might overflow... I will get back to this. Thanks for pointing this out.
When you've got it sorted out, go ahead and file a BZ, include the 
regression markers so that it shows up in the searches most of us are 
paying the most attention to right now.

jeff