From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18121 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2005 08:55:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18053 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2005 08:55:37 -0000 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.198) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 08:55:37 +0000 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so162502wri for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.39.29 with SMTP id m29mr497739wrm; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.56.63 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 01:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5460e33305070701554b5e56ef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 08:55:00 -0000 From: Christian Joensson Reply-To: Christian Joensson To: Paolo Carlini Subject: Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Cc: Eric Botcazou , Jakub Jelinek , gcc In-Reply-To: <5460e3330507060935663aafa0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5460e3330507060638380aac4c@mail.gmail.com> <200507061603.20147.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <42CBE6C0.604@suse.de> <42CBE865.7020600@suse.de> <5460e3330507060722723787a0@mail.gmail.com> <42CBECA5.6010102@suse.de> <5460e3330507060935663aafa0@mail.gmail.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00270.txt.bz2 On 7/6/05, Christian Joensson wrote: > On 7/6/05, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > Christian Joensson wrote: > > > > >limiting this e-mail... I could also rebootstrap 4.0.0 if you think > > >that'd be more useful... let me know what you would like... > > > > > Well, every possible independent check can be useful. Both > > rebootstrapping 4.0.0 with your exact current machine certainly makes > > sense (maybe it's obvious to you but for this kind of work, it suffices > > a simple 'make' and only --enable-languages=3Dc++, will take *a lot* le= ss > > time) and testing 4.0.1 with a machine as similar as possible to the one > > you used at the time for 4.0.0. > > > > Also, of course I would like to see the libstdc++.log bits for the fail= s. >=20 > so, 4.0.0 c++ only is on the way... and here's the relevant(?) > libstdc++.log bits: So, 4.0.0 testsuite posted at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00344.html What would you like me to do now? I could back off binutils to binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5 and rebootstrap both 4.0.0 and 4.0.1 RC3 for c++ only... --=20 Cheers, /ChJ