Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?

[Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>]

On 02/23/15 14:41, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +0000, "Zamyatin, Igor" <igor.zamyatin@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Jeff Law wrote:
>>>>> The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, his assignment
>>>>> within Intel has changed and thus he's not going to have time to work on
>>>>> Cilk+ anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>> Igor Zamyatin has been doing a fair amount of Cilk+ maintenance/bugfixing
>>>>> and it might make sense for him to own it in the long term if he's interested.
>>>>
>>>> That's right.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>> Can I add 2 records (cilk plus and libcilkrts) to Various Maintainers section?
>>>
>>> I understand Jeff's email as a pre-approval of such a patch.
>>
>> I think only SC can appoint maintainers, and while Jeff is in the SC,
>> my reading of that mail wasn't that it was the SC that has acked that, but
>> rather a question if Igor is willing to take that role, which then would
>> need to be acked by SC.
>>
>
> Where are we on this?  Do we have a maintainer for Cilk Plus
> and its run-time library?
Not at this time.  There was a bit of blockage on various things with 
the steering committee (who approves maintainers).  I've got a 
half-dozen or so proposals queued (including Cilk maintainership).

Jeff