From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47414 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2020 22:11:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 47402 invoked by uid 89); 25 Feb 2020 22:11:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=employer, labelled, modi, H*f:sk:f16e388 X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (207.211.31.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:11:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582668675; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Of1uh/RwVjdhpGYWPELmyr6SBxsUIZuit6n+4xqzDpY=; b=UNDiGeMteAMM8nvVlTtRzw5Y4zcxX6n2w72qF3KkTfh1fDgytxas0DqGrXKN7SwdAnawR3 hJBqPQ/v0XVcSq3own7F4lkv6TSlx6XjWR/RhiPnDVNowCLfTVpSyQGdJLsEjD6hETP2yq 2zwXWJLFZW9B5RjrhB78RumbKbbOXRE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-289-Bq0b_bK_OYSNO1cuqPmNCg-1; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:11:07 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 490BB18B9FC1; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-116-56.phx2.redhat.com (ovpn-116-56.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.56]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D5960C18; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <55b69c47cdf69bc8ace1cf0547468735836c5ec1.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements From: David Malcolm To: Modi Mo , "law@redhat.com" , Nicholas Krause , Eric Gallager , Pedro Alves Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis , Andrew Dean , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , "ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE" , "mikestump@comcast.net" , "jason@redhat.com" , Jonathan Wakely , Richard Biener Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <2f583ca8-56ea-460f-bcaf-c70108451aa8@palves.net> <00f451fc092111eb29a74e5bee0e9b778c3c16fe.camel@redhat.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.5 (3.32.5-1.fc30) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 19:58 +0000, Modi Mo wrote: > > On 2/12/20 8:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > The patch will need an update to the docs; search for > > "Tools/packages necessary for building GCC" in > > gcc/doc/install.texi, which currently has some paragraphs labelled: > > @item ISO C++98 compiler > > that will need changing. > > Added this change in the attached patch. Thanks Modi. Before looking at the updated patch in detail, we ought to also address the legal prerequisites for contributing. Does your employer have legal paperwork in place with the FSF for such contributions? See: https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal I'm not sure what the threshold is for a contribution to be regarded as "significant", but it seems that we ought to be fastidious here, given historical attitudes between Microsoft and the FLOSS community. (I'm not speaking on behalf of anyone other than myself here, as a GCC maintainer, and I don't mean for this to come across as personal) Thanks Dave