From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 958 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2002 08:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 951 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2002 08:06:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2002 08:06:00 -0000 Received: from warlock.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9L83ke01437; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:03:46 -0700 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:37:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: Zack Weinberg , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" cc: "debian-gcc@lists.debian.org" Subject: Re: [3.2] Reconsider patches for bison 1.50? Message-ID: <5670000.1035187426@warlock.codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <20021020214101.GA31693@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01240.txt.bz2 > I think we should reconsider not backporting the patches for bison 1.50 > to the 3.2 branch. OK; let's reconsider. Please point me at the patches. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com