* Is it legitmate to have a fallthru succ edge but a different basic block next?
@ 2008-06-27 12:21 Bingfeng Mei
2008-06-27 20:38 ` Steven Bosscher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bingfeng Mei @ 2008-06-27 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hello,
I try to locate a problem in GCSE pass and found some suspicious RTL
code as follows. Is it legitimate to have a "fallthru" succ edge but
next basic block is a different one? Thanks.
...
;; Succ edge 10 [91.5%] (fallthru)
;; Succ edge 9 [8.5%]
;; Start of basic block ( 8) -> 9
...
Cheers,
Bingfeng Mei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Is it legitmate to have a fallthru succ edge but a different basic block next?
2008-06-27 12:21 Is it legitmate to have a fallthru succ edge but a different basic block next? Bingfeng Mei
@ 2008-06-27 20:38 ` Steven Bosscher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven Bosscher @ 2008-06-27 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bingfeng Mei; +Cc: gcc
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Bingfeng Mei <bmei@broadcom.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I try to locate a problem in GCSE pass and found some suspicious RTL
> code as follows. Is it legitimate to have a "fallthru" succ edge but
> next basic block is a different one? Thanks.
>
> ...
> ;; Succ edge 10 [91.5%] (fallthru)
>
> ;; Succ edge 9 [8.5%]
>
> ;; Start of basic block ( 8) -> 9
> ...
Yes, this is valid if you are in cfglayout mode.
Gr.
Steven
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-27 20:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-27 12:21 Is it legitmate to have a fallthru succ edge but a different basic block next? Bingfeng Mei
2008-06-27 20:38 ` Steven Bosscher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).