public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Michael Matz <matzmich@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Release
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59960000.1018898361@gandalf.codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0204152106220.20414-100000@platon>



--On Monday, April 15, 2002 09:11:02 PM +0200 Michael Matz 
<matzmich@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
>> > This means 5 month for GCC 3.2 after GCC 3.1 is released?  I though we
>> > had a 6 month cycle - and the point was to *extend* the period not to
>> > shorten it,
>>
>> I was unclear.  The proposal the SC is voting on is to create a 7-month
>> cycle, as opposed to our current 6-month cycle.
>
> So, you meant actually to push back the _release_ of 3.2 to january 1st,
> right? (June + 7 == 13)  Or you already included the month from May to
> June into those 7 months?  Then you meant december 1st?  But certainly not
> october, right?

By the time we hit June 1, we will already be three months into the 3.2
release cycle.

Under my proposal to the SC, June 1 will be the end of Stage 1, August
1 will be the end of Stage 2, October 1 will be end of Stage 3, and the
3.2 release will appear December 1.

So, you're right -- I cannot count.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-15 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-12 18:51 Mark Mitchell
2002-04-13  2:21 ` Neil Booth
2002-04-13  7:50   ` Toon Moene
2002-04-13  8:40     ` Tim Prince
2002-04-13 23:07     ` Bryce McKinlay
2002-04-14 17:04       ` David Edelsohn
2002-04-15 17:19         ` David O'Brien
2002-04-15 18:02           ` David Edelsohn
2002-04-16 17:06           ` Marc Espie
2002-04-22 19:44       ` David O'Brien
2002-04-22 20:11         ` Bryce McKinlay
2002-04-23 11:04           ` David O'Brien
2002-04-23 16:15             ` Bryce McKinlay
2002-04-22 22:25         ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-04-14  1:33     ` H . J . Lu
2002-04-16 17:00     ` Marc Espie
2002-04-17  2:08       ` Gerald Pfeifer
2002-05-17  5:42         ` Marc Espie
2002-05-17 16:19           ` Loren James Rittle
2002-05-17 17:07             ` David O'Brien
2002-05-17 17:08               ` Marc Espie
2002-04-13 13:18 ` Tom Tromey
2002-04-14  6:59   ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-14  7:25     ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-04-14  8:16       ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-15 10:56     ` Geoff Keating
2002-04-15 11:19       ` H . J . Lu
2002-04-16 15:16         ` mark
2002-04-16 15:23           ` H . J . Lu
2002-04-17  2:54             ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-15 11:36       ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-04-15 11:37         ` Joe Buck
2002-04-15 13:13         ` Geoff Keating
2002-04-15 12:00 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-04-15 12:01   ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:13     ` Michael Matz
2002-04-15 12:22       ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2002-04-15 14:52 ` Geoff Keating
2002-04-15 15:01   ` Mark Mitchell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-05 11:37 Mark Mitchell
2002-05-05 15:00 ` Florian Weimer
2002-05-06  3:24   ` Andreas Schwab
2002-05-06  7:54     ` Mark Mitchell
2002-05-06  7:57       ` Andreas Schwab
2002-05-06 15:16         ` Mark Mitchell
2002-05-07  1:43           ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-15 15:06 Richard Kenner
2002-04-14 10:34 Robert Dewar
2002-04-13 13:51 Robert Dewar
2002-04-03 23:20 John David Anglin
2002-04-03  2:38 Reichelt
2002-04-03 13:21 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-02 14:38 Mark Mitchell
2002-04-02 14:47 ` Tom Tromey
2002-04-03 15:06 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-03 16:08   ` Joe Buck
2002-04-03 17:57     ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-04 10:17     ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-09  9:48       ` Joe Buck
2002-04-09 10:44         ` Benjamin Kosnik
2002-04-09 11:35         ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-10  2:37         ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-10  7:59           ` Joe Buck
2002-04-10  8:17             ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-10  8:22               ` Joe Buck
2002-04-10 10:14             ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-10 11:39               ` Benjamin Kosnik
2002-04-10 11:47                 ` Paolo Carlini
     [not found]                   ` <flwuvfqrme.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
2002-04-12  5:12                     ` Paolo Carlini
2002-04-10 13:01                       ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-11  6:02                         ` Joe Buck
2002-04-11 14:58                           ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-15 17:51               ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-15 19:36                 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-15 19:43                 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 20:03                   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-06  7:47 ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-10 10:17 ` Janis Johnson
2002-04-10 10:24   ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-10 10:35   ` Christian Jönsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59960000.1018898361@gandalf.codesourcery.com \
    --to=mark@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=aj@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=matzmich@cs.tu-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).