From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 2.mo69.mail-out.ovh.net (2.mo69.mail-out.ovh.net [178.33.251.80]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A74AC398B8A7 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:26:11 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A74AC398B8A7 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tesio.it Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tesio.it Received: from player711.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.109.156.41]) by mo69.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F72B9F66 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 17:26:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tesio.it (94-35-39-55.client-mvno.tiscali.it [94.35.39.55]) (Authenticated sender: giacomo@tesio.it) by player711.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C67A1ED20DE9; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-106R006fffbb11b-1b0d-4d34-af67-6d1bb44f8227, 6CE41D23C9698AD425AA4AF6A3DE613FE0CD067A) smtp.auth=giacomo@tesio.it X-OVh-ClientIp: 94.35.39.55 Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 15:26:03 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <5ed046a2-a2f1-f5e3-7399-dbf31808b8ef@gotplt.org> <736215d3-72b8-b2e2-f406-80d3d38688e0@gmail.com> <20210609121128.0000240f@tesio.it> <8feed312-8129-7fed-0885-1aee018a9a99@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: GCC Mission Statement To: Richard Biener CC: Gabriel Ravier , Valentino Giudice , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" From: Giacomo Tesio Message-ID: <5F9B35A9-CAD4-44A3-8132-0DCA2ADDC601@tesio.it> X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 15965542158071033572 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeduuddgledtucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepffgjfhggtgfguffvhffksehtqhhmtddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefiihgrtghomhhoucfvvghsihhouceoghhirggtohhmohesthgvshhiohdrihhtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefhjeegjeefvdevkedvtdekfefggedvgfevjefhleevteeiueeuveeihfefuefgudenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpleegrdefhedrfeelrdehheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdqohhuthdphhgvlhhopehplhgrhigvrhejuddurdhhrgdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhirggtohhmohesthgvshhiohdrihhtpdhrtghpthhtohepghgttgesghgttgdrghhnuhdrohhrgh X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 15:26:13 -0000 Sure Richard, I know=2E On June 9, 2021 2:32:22 PM UTC, Richard Biener wrote: >=20 > You are free to create "DCO-free" branches for the GCC 11 series > (and older), reverting any DCO "incumbered" backports that reach > the official GCC branches for those series=2E =20 I could=2E Like all other people affected by the change=2E If they know they should=2E But isn't this a responsibility inversion? I wonder: is this how you treat your users? "Go fuck yourself" but politely stated? To be honest, this comes to me as a great surprise=2E That's what one would expect by the random guy on github, not by employees of RedHat or Google serving as the Steering Committee of GCC=2E Giacomo