public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira <matheus.a.m.moreira@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Linux system call builtins
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:44:41 +0300 (MSK)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a5b1c2c-6feb-3bf5-cf08-aa93a1b181b8@ispras.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87plv0w10k.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>


On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:

> * Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira via Gcc:
> 
> >   + It's stable
> >
> >         This is one of the things which makes Linux unique
> >         in the operating system landscape: applications
> >         can target the kernel directly. Unlike in virtually
> >         every other operating system out there, the Linux kernel
> >         to user space binary interface is documented[2] as stable.
> >         Breaking it is considered a regression in the kernel.
> >         Therefore it makes sense for a compiler to target it.
> >         The same is not true for any other operating system.
> 
> There is quite a bit of variance in how the kernel is entered.  On
> x86-64, one once popular mechanism is longer present in widely-used
> kernels.

I assume you're implicitly referencing the vsyscall mechanism, but on
amd64 it's not useful to *enter the kernel*, right? It was useful for
obtaining the result of certain syscalls without actually entering
the kernel, like with vdso.

Unlike i386, where the vdso (as well as vsyscall I guess) provides
the __kernel_vsyscall entrypoint, which provides whichever of
{ int 0x80, sysenter, syscall } methods is available and fastest.

Or am I missing something?

Alexander

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-08  9:19 Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira
2024-04-08  9:58 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-04-08 11:59   ` Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira
2024-04-08 14:00     ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-04-08 11:24 ` Florian Weimer
2024-04-08 11:44   ` Alexander Monakov [this message]
2024-04-08 11:50     ` Florian Weimer
2024-04-08 13:01       ` Alexander Monakov
2024-04-08 13:37   ` Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira
2024-04-08 18:18 ` Paul Iannetta
2024-04-08 18:26   ` Andrew Pinski
2024-04-08 20:01     ` Paul Iannetta
2024-04-08 20:20       ` Paul Koning
2024-04-10  1:48     ` Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira
2024-04-10 13:15       ` Paul Koning
2024-04-10 14:10         ` Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira
2024-04-10  1:26   ` Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira
2024-04-08 20:24 ` Paul Floyd
2024-04-10  2:19   ` Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira
2024-04-09 11:45 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2024-04-10  2:59   ` Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira
2024-04-10 11:04     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2024-04-10 14:00       ` Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5a5b1c2c-6feb-3bf5-cf08-aa93a1b181b8@ispras.ru \
    --to=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=matheus.a.m.moreira@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).