From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22190 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2004 18:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22183 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2004 18:08:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 18:08:10 -0000 Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Afjzf-0004Vw-Jq for gcc@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:07:23 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AfkxL-0005EL-NN for gcc@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:09:34 -0500 Received: from [24.4.98.113] (helo=c-24-4-98-113.client.comcast.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AfkxL-0004bS-AS for gcc@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:09:03 -0500 Received: from i8k.3am-software.com (i8100.home [192.168.1.176]) by c-24-4-98-113.client.comcast.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2112B28716 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:06:25 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040111100346.04bf15e8@3am-software.com> X-Sender: matt@3am-software.com Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:08:00 -0000 To: gcc@gnu.org From: Matt Thomas Subject: Re: m68k bootstrapping broken In-Reply-To: <20040111011122.A7949@redhat.com> References: <20040107182419.GA2906@linux-m68k.org> <3FFC71BA.2060105@develer.com> <20040108212228.GA5135@linux-m68k.org> <3FFDD287.5090504@develer.com> <20040109003553.GA8001@linux-m68k.org> <3FFE1E6A.8030304@develer.com> <20040109214753.GA6321@linux-m68k.org> <400069E6.5080301@develer.com> <20040110173359.A3722@redhat.com> <4000EE16.9020907@develer.com> <20040111011122.A7949@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00653.txt.bz2 At 01:11 AM 1/11/2004, Richard Henderson wrote: >On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 07:32:54AM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > > Just an idea: m68k is the only cc0 target capable of an > > hosted bootstrap. Is it possible that middle-end changes > > have subtly broken cc0 targets without anyone noticing > > except on the m68k? > >Possible, yes. It wouldn't be my first guess though. VAX (a cc0 target) is also quite broken in gcc 3.4. I've been at a loss to figure out why. (And VAX could do a hosted bootstrap if gcc wasn't so broken). -- Matt Thomas email: matt@3am-software.com 3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/ Cupertino, CA disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.